User talk:Fayette - Revision history

Narcisgarcia: /* Ubuntu Lucid */

2010-11-04T13:34:23Z

‎Ubuntu Lucid

Fayette: /* Ubuntu Lucid */

2010-11-04T10:37:30Z

‎Ubuntu Lucid

Narcisgarcia: /* Ubuntu Lucid */

2010-11-04T10:06:36Z

‎Ubuntu Lucid

Narcisgarcia: zlib1g-dev for Ubuntu

2010-11-04T10:06:12Z

zlib1g-dev for Ubuntu

New page

== Ubuntu Lucid ==
* (from comment in [[Ubuntu Lucid]] page) Why zlib1g-dev package is needed? There is some strange if you have obtained a 2.6.32.14-ovz32 kernel, when with the guide you should be compiling at least for 2.6.32.22-openvz. Have you seen the updated guide?

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 == Ubuntu Lucid ==
-* (from comment in [[Ubuntu Lucid]] page) Why zlib1g-dev package is needed? There is some strange if you have obtained a 2.6.32.14-ovz32 kernel, when with the guide you should be compiling at least for 2.6.32.22-openvz. Have you seen the updated guide? --[[User:Narcisgarcia|Narcis Garcia]] 10:06, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
+: (from comment in [[Ubuntu Lucid]] page) Why zlib1g-dev package is needed? There is some strange if you have obtained a 2.6.32.14-ovz32 kernel, when with the guide you should be compiling at least for 2.6.32.22-openvz. Have you seen the updated guide? --[[User:Narcisgarcia|Narcis Garcia]] 10:06, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
-* I can't say why it was needed other than the compile failed with a missing zlib.h, if I recall correctly.  I followed the instructions on the web site.  I can't say for sure how I arrived at 2.6.32.14 but I recall having some difficulty locating the kernel source.  I will go back and see if I can find a newer kernel and try again.  Thanks, Jim.
+:: I can't say why it was needed other than the compile failed with a missing zlib.h, if I recall correctly.  I followed the instructions on the web site.  I can't say for sure how I arrived at 2.6.32.14 but I recall having some difficulty locating the kernel source.  I will go back and see if I can find a newer kernel and try again.  Thanks, Jim.

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:37, 4 November 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Ubuntu Lucid ==		== Ubuntu Lucid ==
	* (from comment in [[Ubuntu Lucid]] page) Why zlib1g-dev package is needed? There is some strange if you have obtained a 2.6.32.14-ovz32 kernel, when with the guide you should be compiling at least for 2.6.32.22-openvz. Have you seen the updated guide? --[[User:Narcisgarcia\|Narcis Garcia]] 10:06, 4 November 2010 (UTC)		* (from comment in [[Ubuntu Lucid]] page) Why zlib1g-dev package is needed? There is some strange if you have obtained a 2.6.32.14-ovz32 kernel, when with the guide you should be compiling at least for 2.6.32.22-openvz. Have you seen the updated guide? --[[User:Narcisgarcia\|Narcis Garcia]] 10:06, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+	* I can't say why it was needed other than the compile failed with a missing zlib.h, if I recall correctly. I followed the instructions on the web site. I can't say for sure how I arrived at 2.6.32.14 but I recall having some difficulty locating the kernel source. I will go back and see if I can find a newer kernel and try again. Thanks, Jim.

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:06, 4 November 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Ubuntu Lucid ==		== Ubuntu Lucid ==
−	* (from comment in [[Ubuntu Lucid]] page) Why zlib1g-dev package is needed? There is some strange if you have obtained a 2.6.32.14-ovz32 kernel, when with the guide you should be compiling at least for 2.6.32.22-openvz. Have you seen the updated guide?	+	* (from comment in [[Ubuntu Lucid]] page) Why zlib1g-dev package is needed? There is some strange if you have obtained a 2.6.32.14-ovz32 kernel, when with the guide you should be compiling at least for 2.6.32.22-openvz. Have you seen the updated guide? --[[User:Narcisgarcia\|Narcis Garcia]] 10:06, 4 November 2010 (UTC)