Difference between revisions of "Performance/Network Throughput"
Vlukovnikov (talk | contribs) (Created page with '=== Benchmark Description === In this benchmark we measure throughput over 10 Gbit network connection in two directions: * from VM/CT to physical client * from physical client t…') |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 13:11, 14 April 2011
Contents
Benchmark Description
In this benchmark we measure throughput over 10 Gbit network connection in two directions:
- from VM/CT to physical client
- from physical client to VM/CT
Implementation
To measure network throughput we use standard performance test netperf. Host with VM/CT and physical client connected are interconnected directly (without switches, etc.)
Testbed Configuration
Server: 4xHexCore Intel Xeon (2.66 GHz), 32 GB RAM, Intel 82598EB 10-Gigabit network card
Client: 4xHexCore Intel Xeon (2.136 GHz), 32 GB RAM, Intel 82598EB 10-Gigabit network card
Network: 10Gbit direct server<>client optical connection
Virtualization Software: ESXi4.1upd1, XenServer5.6fp1, HyperV (R2), OpenVZ (RH6) 2.6.32-042test006.1.x86_64
Guest OS: Centos 5.5 x86_64
Software and Tunings:
- netperf v2.4.5
- one VM/CT with netperf configured with 4 vCPU, 4 GB RAM
- where it was possible, we set offloading & hardware checksumming (gro, gso,etc...) and jumbo frames (MTU=9000) features
- netperf run string:
- Server: netserver -p PORT (5 instances)
- Client: netperf -p PORT -HOST -t TCP_SENDFILE -l 300 (several instanes)
- Firewall was turned off
- All other tunings were left at default values
Benchmark Results
Summary
- OpenVZ support near native 10Gbit network throughput: 9.70Gbit in receive and 9.87Gbit in send tests
- OpenVZ shows the best network throughput over all the solutions tested
- In Receive performance test (physical client-> VM/CT) OpenVZ shows great benefits over hypervisors: x2 Times faster than ESXi4.1 and x5 Times faster than XenServer5.6