Difference between revisions of "NFS server inside container"

From OpenVZ Virtuozzo Containers Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Reverted edits by Brianpalmer2010 (Talk) to last revision by Kir)
(Kernel NFS server: how to)
Line 7: Line 7:
  
 
== Kernel NFS server ==
 
== Kernel NFS server ==
Binary RPMs that are provided by OpenVZ community contain kernels compiled
+
 
without NFS server support. Thus you have to
+
Kernel-space NFS server is supported by latest RHEL5 and RHEL6 based kernels and since vzctl-3.0.24.
[[Kernel build|recompile the kernel]] with <code>CONFIG_NFSD=m</code>. After booting in this kernel you'll be able
+
 
to use NFS server on [[HN]].
+
In order to run an NFS server inside a container, make sure:
In-kernel NFS server runs kernel threads to service requests of clients.
+
* nfsd kernel module is loaded on host system before starting a container
But for security reasons kernel threads are prohibited in [[container]]s! So you won't
+
* nfsd feature for a container is turned on (<code>vzctl set $CTID --feature nfsd:on --save</code>)
be able to run NFS server inside [[container]] without patching the kernel.
 
  
 
== User-space NFS server ==
 
== User-space NFS server ==

Revision as of 14:42, 4 May 2011

There are two ways to setup NFS server on common HN: use a user-space NFS server daemon or use an in-kernel implementation of NFS server. Some peculiarities appear if you intend to run NFS server in container.

Yellowpin.svg Note: for information about NFS client inside container, see NFS.

Kernel NFS server

Kernel-space NFS server is supported by latest RHEL5 and RHEL6 based kernels and since vzctl-3.0.24.

In order to run an NFS server inside a container, make sure:

  • nfsd kernel module is loaded on host system before starting a container
  • nfsd feature for a container is turned on (vzctl set $CTID --feature nfsd:on --save)

User-space NFS server

Advantage of user-space NFS server is that it does not require kernel support. Also if it crashes — there is no crash of the system: just one process dies, not the kernel! The disadvantage of user-space NFS server is its productivity: no one can be faster than in-kernel implementation.

One well-known implementation of NFS server is "The LINUX User-Space NFS Server" by Olaf Kirch. Some Linux distributions contain this package: Debian Sarge (nfs-user-server), OpenSUSE 10.0 (nfs-server). For other distributions you can download sources (for example from Debian repository) and compile it. There is a small trick you have to know about running mountd and nfsd (these two daemons and portmap constitute a user-space server). You should run them with the -r option:

# portmap
# rpc.mountd -r
# rpc.nfsd -r

The reason is that these daemons check the major number of the device where the directory to export resides. If major equals 0 then daemons assume that it is NFS and don't want to re-export it. Symptoms are that clients will always get a "permission denied" error. Simfs (the file system on which container is located) is associated with so called unnamed device, in which major equals 0. So, to prevent daemons from checking for re-exporting — just use this -r option.

“The LINUX User-Space NFS Server” by Olaf Kirch implements NFSv2. It means that only files with sizes less than 2GB are processed. If you intend to use such big files then you should use another user-space NFS server implementation: unfs3. It implements v3 of NFS protocol standard.

Please note that the user-space NFS server does not provide locking, or at least I couldn't get locking to work - Elronxenu 19:49, 15 November 2007 (EST)

On Debian Lenny

The current stable debian version 5.0 (lenny) provides two packages for user space nfs support: nfs-user-server and unfs3. Here i describe my experiences with them --Strimo 17:47, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

nfs-user-server

IMPORTANT : read http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=515957 , nfs-user-server was removed

aptitude install nfs-user-server

First i used nfs-user-server package since i didn't know unfs3. After installing i always got the permission denied error when i tried to mount any exported path until i found this article. So i patched the /etc/init.d/nfs-user-server file to include the -r parameter by adding -- -r to the start-stop-daemon line responsible for starting rpc.mountd and rpc.nfsd:

        start-stop-daemon --start --oknodo --quiet --exec /usr/sbin/rpc.nfsd -- -r
        start-stop-daemon --start --oknodo --quiet --exec /usr/sbin/rpc.mountd -- -r

After the modification and a nfs server restart (/etc/init.d/nfs-user-server restart) i was able to mount a nfs share. At first the nfs server seems to work fine but anytime i want to edit any text file (using nano or mcedit) i got strange errors on writing to the file and i never solved the problem nor detected why this happens. So i switched to unfs3 ...

Note: nfsmount from busybox not works with nfs-user-server in Debian Lenny, it write message "rpc failed: 2" when I try boot from nfs server. unfs3 works fine. Such problem into Ubuntu: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-user-server/+bug/189593

unfs3

aptitude install unfs3

Works fine until now. Note that both unfs3 and nfs-user-server do not support file locking!

On CentOS 5

If you are running RedHat/CentOS, you can get unfs3 from the DAG repository

External links