Difference between revisions of "Talk:UBC secondary parameters"
(→privvmpages contradiction) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | == privvmpages contradiction == | ||
From the privvmpages section: | From the privvmpages section: | ||
| Line 6: | Line 7: | ||
This seems contradictory. [[User:Merlin83b|Merlin83b]] 05:46, 5 June 2007 (EDT) | This seems contradictory. [[User:Merlin83b|Merlin83b]] 05:46, 5 June 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : Thanks, I have changed that to ''Total privvmpages should correlate with the physical resources of the computer'', which indeed sound a bit more correct. --[[User:Kir|Kir]] 05:53, 5 June 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | This page is very difficult to read. Perhaps someone with a better understanding of English can try again? | ||
Latest revision as of 07:28, 4 September 2012
privvmpages contradiction[edit]
From the privvmpages section:
“Since the memory accounted into privvmpages may not be actually used, the sum of current privvmpages values for all Virtual Environments may exceed the RAM and swap size of the computer. ... Total privvmpages should match the physical resources of the computer.”
This seems contradictory. Merlin83b 05:46, 5 June 2007 (EDT)
- Thanks, I have changed that to Total privvmpages should correlate with the physical resources of the computer, which indeed sound a bit more correct. --Kir 05:53, 5 June 2007 (EDT)
This page is very difficult to read. Perhaps someone with a better understanding of English can try again?
