Difference between revisions of "User talk:Perchrh"
m |
m (reformatted the reply to be indented as it is usually done on wiki) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Thank you for working with our wiki! --[[User:Kir|Kir]] 15:06, 5 March 2008 (EST) | Thank you for working with our wiki! --[[User:Kir|Kir]] 15:06, 5 March 2008 (EST) | ||
| − | + | : Yes, you are right. The reason I added it is that on my centos 5 x86-64 machine I was not able to run vzpkg, it failed because it tried calling a script which is part of vzctl-lib. As you say there should be a dependency in place. My experience is that it is missing. Therefore I recommend to add vzctl-lib to the yum-command. It will not cause any problems if the dependency is in place, right? | |
| − | |||
| − | Yes, you are right. The reason I added it is that on my centos 5 x86-64 machine I was not able to run vzpkg, it failed because it tried calling a script which is part of vzctl-lib. As you say there should be a dependency in place. My experience is that it is missing. Therefore I recommend to add vzctl-lib to the yum-command. It will not cause any problems if the dependency is in place, right? | ||
Revision as of 10:02, 6 March 2008
Why vzctl-lib?
In your edit [1], you added vzctl-lib to yum command needed to install vzpkg. I think that vzpkg depends on vzctl, which in turn depends on vzctl-lib, so it should be picked up automatically. Was it the case for you that vzpkg didn't work unless being installed with explicit mention of vzctl-lib, or you just added that for some other reason? I'm going to revert your edit but really need to know why you did it.
Thank you for working with our wiki! --Kir 15:06, 5 March 2008 (EST)
- Yes, you are right. The reason I added it is that on my centos 5 x86-64 machine I was not able to run vzpkg, it failed because it tried calling a script which is part of vzctl-lib. As you say there should be a dependency in place. My experience is that it is missing. Therefore I recommend to add vzctl-lib to the yum-command. It will not cause any problems if the dependency is in place, right?
