Difference between revisions of "Talk:Download/template/precreated"

From OpenVZ Virtuozzo Containers Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(replied, signed)
(Contributed templates)
Line 21: Line 21:
 
: Roman Savochenko 03 Feb 2010 13:05 +02:00
 
: Roman Savochenko 03 Feb 2010 13:05 +02:00
 
:: Done --[[User:Kir|Kir]] 13:40, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
 
:: Done --[[User:Kir|Kir]] 13:40, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
 +
 +
* I have built an x86 Ubuntu 10.04 (Lucid Lynx) template for download. Thanks to Bodhi Zazen  for great instructions (http://blog.bodhizazen.net/linux/ubuntu-10-04-openvz-templates/).
 +
Template can be found from here: http://www.setti.info/openvz/ubuntu-10.04-x86-minimal.tar.gz
 +
--[[User:Clust|Clust]] 09:56, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
  
 
== Some old notes (no more relevant) ==
 
== Some old notes (no more relevant) ==

Revision as of 09:56, 30 April 2010

Error reporting

Where to report an error in one of the templates? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 92.124.110.96 (talkcontribs) 19:37, 24 April 2010.

http://bugzilla.openvz.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=OpenVZ&component=templates --Kir 07:22, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Contributed templates

It's no longer available --Kir 09:40, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
Uploaded to contribs --Kir 09:40, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
Now it's time to build a temblate for Ubuntu 8.04.3 ! --Narcis Garcia 14:50, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
Uploaded to contribs --Kir 09:40, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
On last days of october will be time to build a template for Ubutu 9.10 ! --Narcis Garcia 14:50, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
Roman Savochenko 03 Feb 2010 13:05 +02:00
Done --Kir 13:40, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Template can be found from here: http://www.setti.info/openvz/ubuntu-10.04-x86-minimal.tar.gz --Clust 09:56, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Some old notes (no more relevant)

  • Just added a note to the article that the Debian images are still insecure. It would be better to replace the images with corrected ones, but I have no idea who to contact. --Bluehorn 09:42, 5 July 2008 (EDT)
  • The Centos 5 minimal x86-64 image appears to be lacking in many ways. Most importantly it doesn't set up /dev properly. I'm going to test out the Centos 5 not-so minimal image. --cbsmith 17:53 22 Sept 2008 (PDT)