Difference between revisions of "Bike vs car"
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
| {{bad|No}} || {{good|Yes}} | | {{bad|No}} || {{good|Yes}} | ||
|} | |} | ||
| − | + | |- | |
| + | ! Noise level | ||
| + | | {{bad|High}} || {{good|Low}} | ||
| + | |} | ||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
* [[Car vs bike]] | * [[Car vs bike]] | ||
Revision as of 22:28, 20 August 2010
| Feature | Car | Bike |
|---|---|---|
| Ecological | No | Yes |
| Price | High | Low |
| Needs a parking slot | Yes | No |
| Periodical maintenance cost | High | Low |
| Needs refuelling | Yes | No |
| Can drive on a footpath | No | Yes |
| Lightweight aluminum frame | No | Yes |
| Ability to take with you on a train | No | Yes |
| Ability to sleep on road | Yes | No |
| Dangerous to text while driving | Yes | No |
| Extreme harm likely if you impact a pedestrian | Yes | No |
| Keeps you fit | No | Yes |
|- ! Noise level | style="background: #ffdddd; text-align: center" | High || style="background: #ddffdd; text-align: center" | Low |}
