Difference between revisions of "User talk:Fayette"
Narcisgarcia (talk | contribs) (zlib1g-dev for Ubuntu) |
Narcisgarcia (talk | contribs) (→Ubuntu Lucid) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Ubuntu Lucid == | == Ubuntu Lucid == | ||
− | + | : (from comment in [[Ubuntu Lucid]] page) Why zlib1g-dev package is needed? There is some strange if you have obtained a 2.6.32.14-ovz32 kernel, when with the guide you should be compiling at least for 2.6.32.22-openvz. Have you seen the updated guide? --[[User:Narcisgarcia|Narcis Garcia]] 10:06, 4 November 2010 (UTC) | |
+ | |||
+ | :: I can't say why it was needed other than the compile failed with a missing zlib.h, if I recall correctly. I followed the instructions on the web site. I can't say for sure how I arrived at 2.6.32.14 but I recall having some difficulty locating the kernel source. I will go back and see if I can find a newer kernel and try again. Thanks, Jim. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::: We can follow better these issues in a forum thread, such as [http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1382823 in Ubuntu's] --[[User:Narcisgarcia|Narcis Garcia]] 13:34, 4 November 2010 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 13:34, 4 November 2010
Ubuntu Lucid[edit]
- (from comment in Ubuntu Lucid page) Why zlib1g-dev package is needed? There is some strange if you have obtained a 2.6.32.14-ovz32 kernel, when with the guide you should be compiling at least for 2.6.32.22-openvz. Have you seen the updated guide? --Narcis Garcia 10:06, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
- I can't say why it was needed other than the compile failed with a missing zlib.h, if I recall correctly. I followed the instructions on the web site. I can't say for sure how I arrived at 2.6.32.14 but I recall having some difficulty locating the kernel source. I will go back and see if I can find a newer kernel and try again. Thanks, Jim.
- We can follow better these issues in a forum thread, such as in Ubuntu's --Narcis Garcia 13:34, 4 November 2010 (UTC)