Difference between revisions of "Bike vs car"
m (Reverted edits by StevenCook (talk) to last revision by Kir) |
|||
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
! Tire replacement cost | ! Tire replacement cost | ||
| {{bad|High}} || {{good|Low}} | | {{bad|High}} || {{good|Low}} | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | ! Speedup by tuning / doping | ||
| + | | {{good|High}} || {{bad|High}} | ||
|} | |} | ||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
* [[Car vs bike]] | * [[Car vs bike]] | ||
Latest revision as of 11:58, 27 March 2013
| Feature | Car | Bike |
|---|---|---|
| Ecological | No | Yes |
| Price | High | Low |
| Needs a parking slot | Yes | No |
| Periodical maintenance cost | High | Low |
| Needs refuelling | Yes | No |
| Can drive on a footpath | No | Yes |
| Lightweight aluminum frame | No | Yes |
| Ability to take with you on a train | No | Yes |
| Dangerous to text while driving | Yes | Yes |
| Extreme harm likely if you impact a pedestrian | Yes | No |
| Keeps you fit | No | Yes |
| Noise level | High | Low |
| Can be easily repaired | No | Yes |
| You need a driving license | Yes | No |
| Tire replacement cost | High | Low |
| Speedup by tuning / doping | High | High |
