Difference between revisions of "Comparison"
(removed old benefits) |
(New comparison table) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | |||
− | == Feature comparison of different | + | == Feature comparison of different virtualization solutions == |
{| class="wikitable sortable" | {| class="wikitable sortable" | ||
− | ! | + | !Feature |
− | !OpenVZ | + | !Description |
− | !Virtuozzo 6 | + | !OpenVZ (stable) |
− | !Virtuozzo 7 | + | !Virtuozzo 6 (PCS 6) |
− | !Virtuozzo 7 | + | !Virtuozzo 7 |
+ | !Virtuozzo 7 Plus | ||
+ | !LXC | ||
!Proxmox | !Proxmox | ||
− | + | !Microsoft Hyper-V 2012 R2 | |
− | !Microsoft Hyper-V | + | !RHEV 3.5 |
+ | !Citrix XenServer 6.5 | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |'''HW virtualization support (Hypervisor)''' |
− | + | |Full emulation of underneath hardware level: full isolation guest environment, no dependencies from host OS, overhead for hypervisor layer. | |
− | + | |No | |
− | + | |Yes | |
− | + | |Yes | |
− | + | |Yes | |
− | |||
− | | | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | | | ||
− | | | ||
− | | | ||
− | |||
− | | | ||
|No | |No | ||
|Yes | |Yes | ||
|Yes | |Yes | ||
|Yes | |Yes | ||
− | | | + | |Yes |
− | |||
− | |||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |'''OS-level virtualization (Containers)''' |
− | | | + | |Sharing the same instance of host OS: high density, high performance, high dependencies from host OS. |
− | | | + | |Yes |
− | | | + | |Yes |
− | | | + | |Yes |
− | | | + | |Yes |
− | | | + | |Yes |
− | | | + | |Yes |
+ | |No | ||
+ | |No | ||
+ | |No | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |'''Hypervisor technology''' |
− | | | + | |Technology that enables to run Virtual Machines. |
− | | | + | |None |
− | | | + | |Parallels Desktop Monitor |
− | | | + | |KVM |
− | | | + | |KVM |
− | | | + | |None |
− | | | + | |KVM |
+ | |Hyper-V | ||
+ | |KVM | ||
+ | |Xen | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |'''Containers technology''' |
− | | | + | |Technology that enables to run Containers. |
− | | | + | |Virtuozzo Containers |
− | | | + | |Virtuozzo Containers with enhancements |
− | | | + | |Virtuozzo Containers with enhancements |
− | | | + | |Virtuozzo Containers with enhancements |
− | | | + | |Linux containers |
− | | | + | |LXC (moved from OpenVZ since 4.0) |
+ | |None | ||
+ | |None | ||
+ | |None | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |'''Memory Overcommit''' |
+ | |Ability to present more memory to virtual machines than physically available | ||
+ | |Yes | ||
+ | |Yes | ||
+ | |Yes | ||
+ | |Yes | ||
+ | |Yes | ||
+ | |Yes | ||
+ | |Yes | ||
+ | |Yes | ||
+ | |Yes | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |'''Page sharing''' | ||
+ | |Memory (RAM) savings through sharing identical memory pages across virtual machines | ||
+ | |Yes | ||
+ | |Yes, only for CTs | ||
+ | |Yes | ||
+ | |Yes | ||
+ | |Yes | ||
+ | |Yes | ||
+ | |No | ||
+ | |Yes | ||
|No | |No | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |'''Unified management tool for CTs and VMs''' |
− | | | + | |Single tool for managing both containers and virtual machines (if applicable) |
− | | | + | |None |
− | | | + | |Yes |
− | | | + | |Yes |
− | | | + | |Yes |
− | | | + | |None |
− | | | + | |No |
+ | |None | ||
+ | |None | ||
+ | |None | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |'''Central Management tool''' |
+ | |Is centralized multi-server management available for this edition? | ||
+ | |Yes, 3rd party | ||
+ | |Yes, Parallels Virtual Automation (PVA) | ||
|No | |No | ||
+ | |Yes, PVA | ||
+ | |Yes, 3rd party | ||
|Yes | |Yes | ||
− | | | + | |Yes, System Center Virtual Machine Manager |
− | | | + | |Yes, RHEV Manager |
− | | | + | |Yes, XenCenter |
− | | | + | |- |
− | | | + | |'''Update Management''' |
+ | |Integrated patching mechanism for the virtual environments (Guest OS) / guest tools / templates | ||
+ | |No integrated update, YUM (Linux) | ||
+ | |No integrated update, YUM (Linux), WSUS (Windows) | ||
+ | |No integrated update, YUM (Linux), WSUS (Windows) | ||
+ | |No integrated update, YUM (Linux), WSUS (Windows) | ||
+ | |No integrated update, APT (Linux) | ||
+ | |No integrated update, YUM (Linux), WSUS (Windows) | ||
+ | |Yes (WSUS, SCCM, Virtual Machine Servicing Tool 2012 for offline VM update) | ||
+ | |No integrated update, YUM (Linux), WSUS (Windows) | ||
+ | |No integrated update, YUM (Linux), WSUS (Windows) | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |Live | + | |'''Live VE snapshot''' |
+ | |Ability to take a snapshot of a virtual environment while the guest OS is running (e.g. for roll-back or backup purposes) | ||
+ | |Yes | ||
+ | |Yes | ||
+ | |Yes | ||
+ | |Yes | ||
+ | |Offline, CRIU support is planned | ||
+ | |Yes | ||
|Yes | |Yes | ||
|Yes | |Yes | ||
|Yes | |Yes | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |'''Integrated Backup''' |
+ | |Are backup plugins/tools provided to backup virtual environments (over and above the ability to perform classic backup using agents in the guests) | ||
+ | |No | ||
+ | |Yes | ||
|No | |No | ||
|Yes | |Yes | ||
+ | |No | ||
|Yes | |Yes | ||
|Yes | |Yes | ||
− | | | + | |No |
− | | | + | |No |
− | |||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |'''Backup Integration API''' |
− | |No | + | |Integration with 3rd party backup applications for backup of the virtual environment. |
− | |Yes | + | |No (only through snapshots) |
+ | |Yes | ||
+ | |Yes | ||
+ | |Yes | ||
+ | |No (only through snapshots) | ||
+ | |Yes (vzdump) | ||
|Yes | |Yes | ||
|Yes | |Yes | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
|No | |No | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |'''VEs Templates (VM, CT)''' |
− | | | + | |Ability to create and store master images and deploy virtual machines from them |
− | |Yes | + | |Yes (CT only) |
− | | | + | |Yes |
− | | | + | |Yes |
− | | | + | |Yes |
− | | | + | |Yes (OpeVZ templates) |
− | | | + | |Yes |
+ | |Yes | ||
+ | |Yes | ||
+ | |Yes | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |'''P2V migration''' |
− | |Yes | + | |Integrated or added P2V (or V2V) capability in order to convert physical systems to virtual environment. |
− | |Yes | + | |No |
− | |Yes | + | |Yes |
− | | | + | |Yes |
− | | | + | |Yes |
− | | | + | |No |
− | | | + | |No, 3rd party tools |
+ | |Yes | ||
+ | |No | ||
+ | |No | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |'''Live Migration of VEs''' |
+ | |Ability to migrate virtual machines between hosts without perceived downtime | ||
+ | |Yes, but with no zero downtime | ||
+ | |Yes, Kernal-Level Migration | ||
+ | |Yes, CRIU | ||
+ | |Yes, CRIU | ||
+ | |Offline, CRIU support is planned | ||
|Yes | |Yes | ||
− | |||
|Yes | |Yes | ||
|Yes | |Yes | ||
|Yes | |Yes | ||
− | |||
− | |||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |'''Automated Live Migration (DRS)''' |
− | |No | + | |Ability to put host into maintenance mode which will automatically live migrate all virtual machines onto other available hosts so that the host can be brought shut down safely |
+ | |No | ||
+ | |No | ||
+ | |No | ||
+ | |Yes | ||
+ | |No | ||
+ | |No | ||
|Yes | |Yes | ||
|Yes | |Yes | ||
|Yes | |Yes | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |'''Storage Migration''' |
− | |No | + | |Integrated Power Management features Ability to automatically migrate vms onto fewer hosts and power off unused capacity (hosts), wake systems back up when required |
+ | |No | ||
+ | |No | ||
+ | |No | ||
+ | |No | ||
+ | |No | ||
+ | |No | ||
|Yes | |Yes | ||
|Yes | |Yes | ||
|Yes | |Yes | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |'''Cluster size''' |
− | | | + | |Maximum number of hosts in the cluster/pool relationship and maximum number vms per cluster/pool (if specified) |
+ | |None | ||
+ | |32 hosts/cluster validated (100 hosts/cluster maximum) - PStorage limitation | ||
+ | |Not tested yet | ||
+ | |Not tested yet | ||
+ | |None | ||
+ | |32 nodes | ||
+ | |64 nodes | ||
+ | |200 nodes | ||
+ | |16 nodes | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |'''Integrated HA''' | ||
+ | |Recover virtual environment in case of host failures through restart on alternative hosts (downtime = restart time) | ||
+ | |No | ||
+ | |Yes | ||
+ | |No | ||
+ | |Yes | ||
+ | |No | ||
+ | |Yes | ||
|Yes | |Yes | ||
|Yes | |Yes | ||
|Yes | |Yes | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |'''Site Failover''' |
+ | |Integrated ability to (ideally live) migrate virtual machine data (virtual disk files) to different storage e.g. for array upgrades/migration and I/O management | ||
+ | |No | ||
+ | |No | ||
+ | |No | ||
+ | |No | ||
+ | |No | ||
+ | |No | ||
+ | |Manual | ||
|No | |No | ||
+ | |Integrated Disaster Recovery - manual | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |'''Supported Storage''' | ||
+ | |Supported types of Storage (DAS: Direct Attached Storage, NAS: Network Attached Storage, FC: Fibre Channel, iSCSI, FCoE - Fibre Channel over Ethernet) | ||
+ | |DAS (EXT4) | ||
+ | |NAS (NFS), DAS (EXT4) | ||
+ | |DAS (EXT4) | ||
+ | |NAS (NFS), DAS (EXT4) | ||
+ | |NAS (NFS), DAS (EXT4) | ||
+ | |SAN, NAS (NFS), Ceph | ||
+ | |DAS, NAS (SMB), SAN (iSCSI, FC, FCoE) | ||
+ | |DAS, NAS (NFS), SAN (iSCSI, FC, FCoE) | ||
+ | |DAS, NAS (NFS), SAN (iSCSI, FC, FCoE) | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |'''Virtual Disk Format''' | ||
+ | |Supported format(s) of the virtual disks for the virtual machines | ||
+ | |CT - ploop | ||
+ | |CT - ploop, VM - ploop | ||
+ | |CT - ploop, VM - ploop\Qcow2 | ||
+ | |CT - ploop, VM - ploop\Qcow2 | ||
+ | |Any | ||
+ | |qcow2 | ||
+ | |vhdx, vhd, pass-though (raw) | ||
+ | |Qcow2, raw disk | ||
+ | |vhd, raw disk | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |'''Thin Disk Provisioning''' | ||
+ | |Ability to over-commit overall disk space by dynamically growing the size of virtual disks based on actual usage rather than pre-allocating full size. | ||
+ | |Yes | ||
+ | |Yes | ||
+ | |Yes | ||
+ | |Yes | ||
+ | |Yes, depends on disk format (dm-thin) | ||
+ | |Yes (???) | ||
|Yes | |Yes | ||
|Yes | |Yes | ||
|Yes | |Yes | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |'''Virtual SAN''' |
− | | | + | |Enhanced storage capability e.g. providing a virtual SAN through virtualized 'local' storage |
− | |Yes, | + | |Yes, Virtuozzo Storage |
− | |Yes, | + | |Yes, Virtuozzo Storage |
− | |Yes, | + | |Yes, Virtuozzo Storage |
− | | | + | |Yes, Virtuozzo Storage |
− | | | + | |Yes, but 3rd party (DRBD 9, Ceph, GlusterFS) |
− | | | + | |Yes, but 3rd party (DRBD 9, Ceph, GlusterFS) |
+ | |Yes, Storage Spaces | ||
+ | |Yes, Red Hat Storage | ||
+ | |No | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |'''Storage QoS''' |
+ | |Ability to control Quality of Service for Storage I/O for virtual machines | ||
+ | |No | ||
+ | |Only IOPs limits | ||
+ | |Only IOPs limits | ||
+ | |Only IOPs limits | ||
+ | |No | ||
+ | |No | ||
|Yes | |Yes | ||
− | |||
|Yes | |Yes | ||
− | |||
|Yes | |Yes | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |'''Advanced Network Switch''' | ||
+ | |Centralized virtual network configuration (rather than managing virtual switches on individual hosts), typically with enhanced networking capabilities | ||
+ | |No | ||
+ | |No | ||
+ | |No | ||
+ | |No | ||
+ | |No | ||
+ | |Yes, Open vSwitch support | ||
|Yes | |Yes | ||
+ | |Neutron Integration | ||
+ | |Open vSwitch integration | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |'''Network QoS''' | ||
+ | |Ability to create and store master images and deploy virtual machines from them | ||
+ | |Only bandwidth limits | ||
+ | |Only bandwidth limits | ||
+ | |Only bandwidth limits | ||
+ | |Only bandwidth limits | ||
+ | |Only bandwidth limits | ||
+ | |Yes, with Open vSwitch | ||
+ | |Yes | ||
+ | |Yes | ||
+ | |Yes | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |'''Memory deduplication for binary files''' | ||
+ | |Memory and IOPS deduplication management that enables/disables caching for Container directories and files, verifies cache integrity, checks Containers for cache errors, and purges the cache if needed | ||
|No | |No | ||
+ | |Yes, pfcache | ||
+ | |Yes, pfcache | ||
+ | |Yes, pfcache | ||
+ | |No | ||
+ | |No | ||
+ | |None | ||
+ | |None | ||
+ | |None | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |'''Completely isolated disk subsystem for CTs''' |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | |Yes, ploop |
− | | | + | |Yes, ploop |
− | | | + | |Yes, ploop |
− | | | + | |Yes, ploop |
− | | | + | |Yes, with LVM |
|No | |No | ||
+ | |None | ||
+ | |None | ||
+ | |None | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |'''API\SDK''' |
− | | | + | | |
+ | |OpenVZ API for Ruby, LibVirt | ||
+ | |Parallels SDK, LibVirt | ||
+ | |Parallels SDK, LibVirt | ||
+ | |Parallels SDK, LibVirt | ||
+ | |Liblxc, API for Ruby, python2, Haskell, Go | ||
+ | |Proxmox VE uses a REST like API (JSON data format) | ||
+ | |Windows SDK | ||
+ | |RHEV-M API: REST API, SDKs | ||
+ | |XenAPI, XenServer SDKs | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |'''Image Catalog integration''' | ||
+ | |Integration with 3rd-party image catalog services of popular server applications and development environments that can be installed with one click. | ||
+ | |No | ||
+ | |No | ||
+ | |No | ||
+ | |Yes (Bitnami) | ||
+ | |No | ||
+ | |Yes (Turnkey) | ||
+ | |None | ||
+ | |None | ||
+ | |None | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |'''Open Stack integration''' | ||
+ | |Driver for Open Stack Nova | ||
+ | |Yes | ||
+ | |Yes | ||
|Yes | |Yes | ||
− | | | + | |Yes |
− | | | + | |Yes |
+ | |(LXC and KVM supported through libvirt) | ||
|Yes | |Yes | ||
|Yes | |Yes | ||
|Yes | |Yes | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |'''Kernel maintenance''' |
− | | | + | |Ability to upgrade kernel with minimal downtime. |
− | | | + | |KernelCare service integration |
− | | | + | |kernel rebootless update (vzreboot) |
− | | | + | |KernelCare service integration |
− | | | + | |kernel rebootless update (vzreboot) |
− | | | + | |KernelCare service integration |
− | | | + | |KernelCare service integration |
+ | |None | ||
+ | |KernelCare service integration | ||
+ | |KernelCare service integration | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |'''Power Panel''' |
− | | | + | |A tool used for managing particular virtual machines and containers by their end users. |
− | | | + | |No |
− | | | + | |Yes |
− | | | + | |No |
− | | | + | |Yes |
− | | | + | |None |
− | | | + | |None |
+ | |None | ||
+ | |None | ||
+ | |None | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |'''Open Source''' |
− | | | + | | |
+ | |Yes | ||
+ | |No | ||
+ | |Yes | ||
+ | |No | ||
+ | |Yes | ||
+ | |Yes | ||
+ | |No | ||
+ | |No | ||
+ | |No (but there is Open Source edition) | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |'''License\Subscription''' | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |No | ||
+ | |Yes | ||
+ | |No | ||
+ | |Yes | ||
|No | |No | ||
− | |||
|No | |No | ||
− | | | + | |Yes |
− | | | + | |Yes |
− | | | + | |Yes, Enterprise Edition |
+ | |- | ||
+ | |'''Support''' | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |Both community and commercial support | ||
+ | |Commercial support | ||
+ | |Community support | ||
+ | |Commercial Support | ||
+ | |Yes, Canonical Ltd. | ||
+ | |Both community and commercial support | ||
+ | |Commercial support | ||
+ | |Commercial support | ||
+ | |Both community and commercial support | ||
+ | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− |
Revision as of 09:42, 23 September 2015
Feature comparison of different virtualization solutions
Feature | Description | OpenVZ (stable) | Virtuozzo 6 (PCS 6) | Virtuozzo 7 | Virtuozzo 7 Plus | LXC | Proxmox | Microsoft Hyper-V 2012 R2 | RHEV 3.5 | Citrix XenServer 6.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HW virtualization support (Hypervisor) | Full emulation of underneath hardware level: full isolation guest environment, no dependencies from host OS, overhead for hypervisor layer. | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
OS-level virtualization (Containers) | Sharing the same instance of host OS: high density, high performance, high dependencies from host OS. | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | No |
Hypervisor technology | Technology that enables to run Virtual Machines. | None | Parallels Desktop Monitor | KVM | KVM | None | KVM | Hyper-V | KVM | Xen |
Containers technology | Technology that enables to run Containers. | Virtuozzo Containers | Virtuozzo Containers with enhancements | Virtuozzo Containers with enhancements | Virtuozzo Containers with enhancements | Linux containers | LXC (moved from OpenVZ since 4.0) | None | None | None |
Memory Overcommit | Ability to present more memory to virtual machines than physically available | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Page sharing | Memory (RAM) savings through sharing identical memory pages across virtual machines | Yes | Yes, only for CTs | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No |
Unified management tool for CTs and VMs | Single tool for managing both containers and virtual machines (if applicable) | None | Yes | Yes | Yes | None | No | None | None | None |
Central Management tool | Is centralized multi-server management available for this edition? | Yes, 3rd party | Yes, Parallels Virtual Automation (PVA) | No | Yes, PVA | Yes, 3rd party | Yes | Yes, System Center Virtual Machine Manager | Yes, RHEV Manager | Yes, XenCenter |
Update Management | Integrated patching mechanism for the virtual environments (Guest OS) / guest tools / templates | No integrated update, YUM (Linux) | No integrated update, YUM (Linux), WSUS (Windows) | No integrated update, YUM (Linux), WSUS (Windows) | No integrated update, YUM (Linux), WSUS (Windows) | No integrated update, APT (Linux) | No integrated update, YUM (Linux), WSUS (Windows) | Yes (WSUS, SCCM, Virtual Machine Servicing Tool 2012 for offline VM update) | No integrated update, YUM (Linux), WSUS (Windows) | No integrated update, YUM (Linux), WSUS (Windows) |
Live VE snapshot | Ability to take a snapshot of a virtual environment while the guest OS is running (e.g. for roll-back or backup purposes) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Offline, CRIU support is planned | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Integrated Backup | Are backup plugins/tools provided to backup virtual environments (over and above the ability to perform classic backup using agents in the guests) | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | No |
Backup Integration API | Integration with 3rd party backup applications for backup of the virtual environment. | No (only through snapshots) | Yes | Yes | Yes | No (only through snapshots) | Yes (vzdump) | Yes | Yes | No |
VEs Templates (VM, CT) | Ability to create and store master images and deploy virtual machines from them | Yes (CT only) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes (OpeVZ templates) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
P2V migration | Integrated or added P2V (or V2V) capability in order to convert physical systems to virtual environment. | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No, 3rd party tools | Yes | No | No |
Live Migration of VEs | Ability to migrate virtual machines between hosts without perceived downtime | Yes, but with no zero downtime | Yes, Kernal-Level Migration | Yes, CRIU | Yes, CRIU | Offline, CRIU support is planned | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Automated Live Migration (DRS) | Ability to put host into maintenance mode which will automatically live migrate all virtual machines onto other available hosts so that the host can be brought shut down safely | No | No | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Storage Migration | Integrated Power Management features Ability to automatically migrate vms onto fewer hosts and power off unused capacity (hosts), wake systems back up when required | No | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Cluster size | Maximum number of hosts in the cluster/pool relationship and maximum number vms per cluster/pool (if specified) | None | 32 hosts/cluster validated (100 hosts/cluster maximum) - PStorage limitation | Not tested yet | Not tested yet | None | 32 nodes | 64 nodes | 200 nodes | 16 nodes |
Integrated HA | Recover virtual environment in case of host failures through restart on alternative hosts (downtime = restart time) | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Site Failover | Integrated ability to (ideally live) migrate virtual machine data (virtual disk files) to different storage e.g. for array upgrades/migration and I/O management | No | No | No | No | No | No | Manual | No | Integrated Disaster Recovery - manual |
Supported Storage | Supported types of Storage (DAS: Direct Attached Storage, NAS: Network Attached Storage, FC: Fibre Channel, iSCSI, FCoE - Fibre Channel over Ethernet) | DAS (EXT4) | NAS (NFS), DAS (EXT4) | DAS (EXT4) | NAS (NFS), DAS (EXT4) | NAS (NFS), DAS (EXT4) | SAN, NAS (NFS), Ceph | DAS, NAS (SMB), SAN (iSCSI, FC, FCoE) | DAS, NAS (NFS), SAN (iSCSI, FC, FCoE) | DAS, NAS (NFS), SAN (iSCSI, FC, FCoE) |
Virtual Disk Format | Supported format(s) of the virtual disks for the virtual machines | CT - ploop | CT - ploop, VM - ploop | CT - ploop, VM - ploop\Qcow2 | CT - ploop, VM - ploop\Qcow2 | Any | qcow2 | vhdx, vhd, pass-though (raw) | Qcow2, raw disk | vhd, raw disk |
Thin Disk Provisioning | Ability to over-commit overall disk space by dynamically growing the size of virtual disks based on actual usage rather than pre-allocating full size. | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes, depends on disk format (dm-thin) | Yes (???) | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Virtual SAN | Enhanced storage capability e.g. providing a virtual SAN through virtualized 'local' storage | Yes, Virtuozzo Storage | Yes, Virtuozzo Storage | Yes, Virtuozzo Storage | Yes, Virtuozzo Storage | Yes, but 3rd party (DRBD 9, Ceph, GlusterFS) | Yes, but 3rd party (DRBD 9, Ceph, GlusterFS) | Yes, Storage Spaces | Yes, Red Hat Storage | No |
Storage QoS | Ability to control Quality of Service for Storage I/O for virtual machines | No | Only IOPs limits | Only IOPs limits | Only IOPs limits | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Advanced Network Switch | Centralized virtual network configuration (rather than managing virtual switches on individual hosts), typically with enhanced networking capabilities | No | No | No | No | No | Yes, Open vSwitch support | Yes | Neutron Integration | Open vSwitch integration |
Network QoS | Ability to create and store master images and deploy virtual machines from them | Only bandwidth limits | Only bandwidth limits | Only bandwidth limits | Only bandwidth limits | Only bandwidth limits | Yes, with Open vSwitch | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Memory deduplication for binary files | Memory and IOPS deduplication management that enables/disables caching for Container directories and files, verifies cache integrity, checks Containers for cache errors, and purges the cache if needed | No | Yes, pfcache | Yes, pfcache | Yes, pfcache | No | No | None | None | None |
Completely isolated disk subsystem for CTs | Yes, ploop | Yes, ploop | Yes, ploop | Yes, ploop | Yes, with LVM | No | None | None | None | |
API\SDK | OpenVZ API for Ruby, LibVirt | Parallels SDK, LibVirt | Parallels SDK, LibVirt | Parallels SDK, LibVirt | Liblxc, API for Ruby, python2, Haskell, Go | Proxmox VE uses a REST like API (JSON data format) | Windows SDK | RHEV-M API: REST API, SDKs | XenAPI, XenServer SDKs | |
Image Catalog integration | Integration with 3rd-party image catalog services of popular server applications and development environments that can be installed with one click. | No | No | No | Yes (Bitnami) | No | Yes (Turnkey) | None | None | None |
Open Stack integration | Driver for Open Stack Nova | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | (LXC and KVM supported through libvirt) | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Kernel maintenance | Ability to upgrade kernel with minimal downtime. | KernelCare service integration | kernel rebootless update (vzreboot) | KernelCare service integration | kernel rebootless update (vzreboot) | KernelCare service integration | KernelCare service integration | None | KernelCare service integration | KernelCare service integration |
Power Panel | A tool used for managing particular virtual machines and containers by their end users. | No | Yes | No | Yes | None | None | None | None | None |
Open Source | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | No | No (but there is Open Source edition) | |
License\Subscription | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes, Enterprise Edition | |
Support | Both community and commercial support | Commercial support | Community support | Commercial Support | Yes, Canonical Ltd. | Both community and commercial support | Commercial support | Commercial support | Both community and commercial support |