Changes
→warnings
There are two ways to setup NFS server on common [[HN]]:
use a user-space NFS server daemon or use an in-kernel implementation
of NFS server. Some peculiarities appear if you intend to run NFS serverin [[VE]].
{{Note|for information about NFS client inside VEcontainer, see [[NFS]].}}
== Kernel NFS server ==
== User-space NFS server ==
Advantage of user-space NFS server is that it can be ran without any does not require kernel support in the kernel.Also if it crashes — there is no crash of the system: just one process crashesdies, not the kernel!
The disadvantage of user-space NFS server is its productivity: no one can be faster than in-kernel implementation.
The reason is that these daemons check the major number of the device where the directory to export resides.
If major equals 0 then daemons assume that it is NFS and don't want to re-export it. Symptoms are
that clients will always get a "permission denied" error. Simfs (the file system on which VE container is located)
is associated with so called unnamed device, in which major equals 0. So, to prevent daemons from checking for
re-exporting — just use this <code>-r</code> option.
than 2GB are processed. If you intend to use such big files then you should use another user-space NFS server
implementation: [http://unfs3.sourceforge.net/ unfs3]. It implements v3 of NFS protocol standard.
Please note that the user-space NFS server does not provide locking, or at least I couldn't get locking to work - [[User:Elronxenu|Elronxenu]] 19:49, 15 November 2007 (EST)
=== On Debian Lenny ===
The current stable debian version 5.0 (lenny) provides two packages for user space nfs support: <code>nfs-user-server</code> and <code>unfs3</code>. Here i describe my experiences with them --[[User:Strimo|Strimo]] 17:47, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
It seems that also the unfs3 package has been removed from the debian repositories. --[[Special:Contributions/95.21.175.189|95.21.175.189]] 23:39, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
==== nfs-user-server ====
IMPORTANT : read http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=515957 , nfs-user-server was removed
<pre>
aptitude install nfs-user-server
</pre>
First i used nfs-user-server package since i didn't know unfs3. After installing i always got the '''permission denied''' error when i tried to mount any exported path until i found this article. So i patched the /etc/init.d/nfs-user-server file to include the <code>-r</code> parameter by adding <code>-- -r</code> to the <code>start-stop-daemon</code> line responsible for starting <code>rpc.mountd</code> and <code>rpc.nfsd</code>:
<pre>
start-stop-daemon --start --oknodo --quiet --exec /usr/sbin/rpc.nfsd -- -r
start-stop-daemon --start --oknodo --quiet --exec /usr/sbin/rpc.mountd -- -r
</pre>
After the modification and a nfs server restart (<code>/etc/init.d/nfs-user-server restart</code>) i was able to mount a nfs share. At first the nfs server seems to work fine but anytime i want to edit any text file (using nano or mcedit) i got strange errors on writing to the file and i never solved the problem nor detected why this happens. So i switched to unfs3 ...
<b>Note</b>: nfsmount from busybox not works with nfs-user-server in Debian Lenny, it write message "rpc failed: 2" when I try boot from nfs server. unfs3 works fine.
Such problem into Ubuntu: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-user-server/+bug/189593
==== unfs3 ====
<pre>
aptitude install unfs3
</pre>
Works fine until now. Note that both unfs3 and nfs-user-server do not support file locking!
NOTE: I tested on centos 5.6 using unfs3 and I had to run the /etc/init.d/nfs service and see it work before I could use unfs. also use exports -a before using sudo /usr/sbin/unfsd -T -e /etc/exports
=== On CentOS 5 ===
If you are running RedHat/CentOS, you can [http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/packages/unfs3/ get unfs3 from the DAG repository]
== External links ==