Difference between revisions of "Bike vs car"
(Added a couple more jocular "comparisons") |
|||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
! Extreme harm likely if you impact a pedestrian | ! Extreme harm likely if you impact a pedestrian | ||
| {{bad|Yes}} || {{good|No}} | | {{bad|Yes}} || {{good|No}} | ||
| − | + | |- | |
| + | ! Keeps you fit | ||
| + | | {{bad|No}} || {{good|Yes}} | ||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 22:21, 20 August 2010
| Feature | Car | Bike |
|---|---|---|
| Ecological | No | Yes |
| Price | High | Low |
| Needs a parking slot | Yes | No |
| Periodical maintenance cost | High | Low |
| Needs refuelling | Yes | No |
| Can drive on a footpath | No | Yes |
| Lightweight aluminum frame | No | Yes |
| Ability to take with you on a train | No | Yes |
| Ability to sleep on road | Yes | No |
| Dangerous to text while driving | Yes | No |
| Extreme harm likely if you impact a pedestrian | Yes | No |
| Keeps you fit | No | Yes |
