Difference between revisions of "Performance"
Vlukovnikov (talk | contribs) (add link to microbenchmarks) |
|||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
|| [[/vConsolidate-SMP/]] | || [[/vConsolidate-SMP/]] | ||
|| SMP configuration of Intel vConsolidate server consolidation benchmark (Java+Apache+MySQL workloads). | || SMP configuration of Intel vConsolidate server consolidation benchmark (Java+Apache+MySQL workloads). | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | || [[/Microbenchmarks/]] | ||
| + | || Various microbenchmarks like context switch, system call, etc. Plus Unixbench resuls. | ||
|} | |} | ||
== External sources == | == External sources == | ||
* [http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2007/HPL-2007-59R1.pdf HP Labs: Performance Evaluation of Virtualization Technologies for Server Consolidation] | * [http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2007/HPL-2007-59R1.pdf HP Labs: Performance Evaluation of Virtualization Technologies for Server Consolidation] | ||
Revision as of 12:01, 26 May 2011
Benchmark results
This page is to collect a list of benchmark results available and demonstrate not only the words about containers technology being more superior from performance point of view compared to hypervisors but also to provide some data proving that.
| Benchmark | Description |
| Response Time | Microbenchmark demonstrating latency issues of interactive applications in virtualized and loaded systems (netperf RR in various conditions). |
| Network Throughput | 10Gbit simple network throughput comparison using netperf test. |
| LAMP | Linux Apache+MySql+PHP (LAMP) stack benchmark in multiple simultaneously running virtualization instances. |
| vConsolidate-UP | UP configuration of Intel vConsolidate server consolidation benchmark (Java+Apache+MySQL workloads). |
| vConsolidate-SMP | SMP configuration of Intel vConsolidate server consolidation benchmark (Java+Apache+MySQL workloads). |
| Microbenchmarks | Various microbenchmarks like context switch, system call, etc. Plus Unixbench resuls. |
