1,734
edits
Changes
Removed like buttons as our users dislike them
== Response Time Benchmark results ==
=== Implementation =External sources ==To measure response time we use well known netperf TCP_RR test* [http://www.hpl. To emulate busy VM/CT we run CPU eater program (busyloop) inside of ithp. To emulate busy system we run several busy VMcom/CT (to eat all the host CPU time). Netperf runs in server mode inside of '''one''' VMtechreports/CT. On the separate physical host we run netperf TCP_RR test against selected VM2007/CT over the 1Gbit networkHPL-2007-59R1. === Testbed Configuration ===pdf HP Labs: Performance Evaluation of Virtualization Technologies for Server: 4xHexCore Intel Xeon (2.66 GHz), 32 GB RAMConsolidation] Client* [http: 4xHexCore Intel Xeon (2//www.136 GHz), 32 GB RAM Network: 1Gbit direct server<>client connection Virtualization Software: ESXi4ieee-jp.1upd1, XenServer5org/section/kansai/chapter/ces/1569177239.6fp1, HyperV pdf A Comparative Study of Open Source Softwares for Virtualization with Streaming Server Applications] - conference proceedings of the 13th IEEE International Symposium on Consumer Electronics (R2ISCE2009), PVC 4.7 (RH6) 2.6.32-042test006.1.x86_64 Guest OS* [http: Centos 5//thesai.5 x86_64 Software and Tunings: * netperf v2.4.5* '''one''' VMorg/CT with netperf in server mode configured with 1 vCPU, 1 GB RAM* '''six''' VMsDownloads/CTs (which needed to load server CPU - see testcases) configured with 4vCPU 1GB RAM* netperf run string:** in VMVolume2No9/CT; netperf Paper%2020%20-p 30300** on the client: netperf %20The%20Performance%20between%20XEN-p 30300 HVM,%20XEN-H 172.0.1.1 PV%20and%20Open-t TCP_RR VZ%20during%20live-l 120 migration.pdf The Performance between XEN-HVM, XEN- PV and Open-r 128 VZ during live-s 128* Firewall was turned off* All other tunings were left at default values. === Benchmark Results ===migration]