Difference between revisions of "Performance"

From OpenVZ Virtuozzo Containers Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(added response time benchmark description)
(performance results of response time test were added)
Line 34: Line 34:
  
 
=== Benchmark Results ===
 
=== Benchmark Results ===
 +
 +
[[File:Rt_idle_idle.JPG]]
 +
 +
[[File:Rt_busy_idle.JPG]]
 +
 +
[[File:Rt_busy_busy.JPG]]
 +
 +
 +
'''In all the three cases (idle system and idle VM/CT, busy system and idle VM/CT, busy system and busy VM/CT) Virtuozzo Containers show the lowest overhead over all the tested virtualization solutions'''

Revision as of 11:16, 21 March 2011

Response Time

Benchmark Description

The aim of this benchmark is to measure how fast can application inside of virtual machine (VM) or operating system container (CT) react on external request under various conditions:

  • Idle system and idle VM/CT
  • Busy system and idle VM/CT
  • Busy system and busy VM/CT

Described benchmark case is common for many latency sensitive real life workloads. For example: high performance computing, image processing and rendering, web and database servers and so on.

Implementation

To measure response time we use well known netperf TCP_RR test. To emulate busy VM/CT we run CPU eater program (busyloop) inside of it. To emulate busy system we run several busy VM/CT (to eat all the host CPU time). Netperf runs in server mode inside of one VM/CT. On the separate physical host we run netperf TCP_RR test against selected VM/CT over the 1Gbit network.

Testbed Configuration

Server: 4xHexCore Intel Xeon (2.66 GHz), 32 GB RAM

Client: 4xHexCore Intel Xeon (2.136 GHz), 32 GB RAM

Network: 1Gbit direct server<>client connection

Virtualization Software: ESXi4.1upd1, XenServer5.6fp1, HyperV (R2), PVC 4.7 (RH6) 2.6.32-042test006.1.x86_64

Guest OS: Centos 5.5 x86_64

Software and Tunings:

  • netperf v2.4.5
  • one VM/CT with netperf in server mode configured with 1 vCPU, 1 GB RAM
  • six VMs/CTs (which needed to load server CPU - see testcases) configured with 4vCPU 1GB RAM
  • netperf run string:
    • in VM/CT; netperf -p 30300
    • on the client: netperf -p 30300 -H 172.0.1.1 -t TCP_RR -l 120 -- -r 128 -s 128
  • Firewall was turned off
  • All other tunings were left at default values.

Benchmark Results

Rt idle idle.JPG

Rt busy idle.JPG

Rt busy busy.JPG


In all the three cases (idle system and idle VM/CT, busy system and idle VM/CT, busy system and busy VM/CT) Virtuozzo Containers show the lowest overhead over all the tested virtualization solutions