Difference between revisions of "Performance/LAMP"

From OpenVZ Virtuozzo Containers Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with '=== Benchmark Description === LAMP (acronym for Linux, Apache, MySQL, PHP) software stack is widely used for building modern web sites. We measure not only performance (how many …')
 
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
=== Benchmark Description ===
 
=== Benchmark Description ===
LAMP (acronym for Linux, Apache, MySQL, PHP) software stack is widely used for building modern web sites. We measure not only performance (how many requests can deliver server), but also maximum response time - to understand QoS.
+
 
 +
LAMP (acronym for Linux, Apache, MySQL, PHP) software stack is widely used for building modern web sites on Linux. So it's quite natural that there is a need to understand how well such type of workloads run in virtualized environment and how many LAMPs virtualization can bare on a single piece of hardware. 2 important metrics are presented in this report: total number of serviced requests/sec and average response time.
  
 
=== Implementation ===
 
=== Implementation ===
  
To measure LAMP software stack performance and density we use DVD-Store E-Commerce benchmark developed by [http://linux.dell.com/dvdstore/ Dell].  
+
To measure LAMP software stack performance and density we use DVD-Store E-Commerce benchmark developed by [http://linux.dell.com/dvdstore/ Dell]. This benchmark is also widely used by RedHat and others.
  
 
=== Testbed Configuration ===
 
=== Testbed Configuration ===
Server: 4xHexCore Intel Xeon (2.66 GHz), 64 GB RAM, HP MSA1500 SAN Storage, 8 SATA (7200 RPM) Disks in RAID0
+
Hardware:
 
+
* Server: 4xHexCore Intel Xeon (2.66 GHz), 64 GB RAM, HP MSA1500 SAN Storage, 8 SATA (7200 RPM) Disks in RAID0
Client: 4xHexCore Intel Xeon (2.136 GHz), 32 GB RAM, Intel 82598EB 10-Gigabit network card
+
*Client: 4xHexCore Intel Xeon (2.136 GHz), 32 GB RAM
 
+
* Network: 1Gbit direct server <-> client connection
Network: Gbit direct server<>client connection
 
 
 
Virtualization Software: ESXi4.1upd1, XenServer5.6fp1, HyperV (R2), OpenVZ (RH6) 2.6.32-042test006.1.x86_64
 
  
Guest OS: Centos 5.5 x86_64
+
Platform:
 +
* Virtualization Software: ESXi4.1upd1, XenServer5.6fp1, HyperV (R2), OpenVZ (RH6) 2.6.32-042test006.1.x86_64
 +
* Guest OS: Centos 5.5 x86_64
  
 
Software and Tunings:
 
Software and Tunings:
Line 34: Line 34:
 
=== Summary ===
 
=== Summary ===
  
* OpenVZ shows the best performance over solutions tested: OpenVZ 38% faster than XenServer and more than x2 times faster than HyperV and ESXi
+
* OpenVZ shows the best performance over solutions tested: OpenVZ 38% faster than XenServer and more than x2 times faster than HyperV and ESXi under high load.
* OpenVZ shows the best response time over solutions tested: OpenVZ has 33% better response time than ESXi and x2 times better response time than XenServer and HyperV
+
* OpenVZ shows the best response time over solutions tested: 33% better response time compared to ESXi and x2 times better response time than XenServer and HyperV

Latest revision as of 16:35, 21 April 2011

Benchmark Description[edit]

LAMP (acronym for Linux, Apache, MySQL, PHP) software stack is widely used for building modern web sites on Linux. So it's quite natural that there is a need to understand how well such type of workloads run in virtualized environment and how many LAMPs virtualization can bare on a single piece of hardware. 2 important metrics are presented in this report: total number of serviced requests/sec and average response time.

Implementation[edit]

To measure LAMP software stack performance and density we use DVD-Store E-Commerce benchmark developed by Dell. This benchmark is also widely used by RedHat and others.

Testbed Configuration[edit]

Hardware:

  • Server: 4xHexCore Intel Xeon (2.66 GHz), 64 GB RAM, HP MSA1500 SAN Storage, 8 SATA (7200 RPM) Disks in RAID0
  • Client: 4xHexCore Intel Xeon (2.136 GHz), 32 GB RAM
  • Network: 1Gbit direct server <-> client connection

Platform:

  • Virtualization Software: ESXi4.1upd1, XenServer5.6fp1, HyperV (R2), OpenVZ (RH6) 2.6.32-042test006.1.x86_64
  • Guest OS: Centos 5.5 x86_64

Software and Tunings:

  • Each VM/CT was configured with 1 vCPU, 1 GB RAM
  • Small db was deployed from DVD Store samples
  • Dvd Store benchmark client run string: ds2webdriver.exe --target=172.0.1.%VM% --think_time=0.05 --n_threads=3 --warmup_time=10 --run_time=10 --db_size_str=S --n_line_items=1 --pct_newcustomers=1
  • Firewall was turned off
  • All other tunings were left at default values

Benchmark Results[edit]

Lamp performance v2.png


Lamp rt v2.png


Summary[edit]

  • OpenVZ shows the best performance over solutions tested: OpenVZ 38% faster than XenServer and more than x2 times faster than HyperV and ESXi under high load.
  • OpenVZ shows the best response time over solutions tested: 33% better response time compared to ESXi and x2 times better response time than XenServer and HyperV