Open main menu

OpenVZ Virtuozzo Containers Wiki β

Editing Performance/vConsolidate-SMP

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 1: Line 1:
 
=== Benchmark Description ===
 
=== Benchmark Description ===
  
The goal of Intel vConsolidate benchmark is to measure aggregated server performance in consolidation scenario: when different (and non-related unlike to LAMP benchmark) applications are running on the same box each in its own virtual environment (virtual machine or container).
+
This benchmark is designed to measure aggregated server performance in consolidation scenario: where different apps are running at the same time in separate virtual machines or operating system containers.
  
vConsolidate benchmark was developed by Intel in cooperation with other vendors. It runs separate workloads with Java (SPECjbb test), Mail, Web and Database VMs running concurrently. Each set of such VMs is called CSU - Consolidation Stack Unit. Performance metric is a geomean from throughput of each workload type: transactions/sec for Db, requests/sec for Web and java operations/sec for Java. The same type of metric is commonly used in other benchmarks like those from SPEC.
 
 
vConsolidate benchmark is very similar to other virtualization specific benchmarks like VMMark from VMWare and SPECvirt, but the latter are more enterprise oriented and generate the load requiring a fast SAN storage and high end hardware. Since we believe containers benefits are even more prominent on commodity hardware we use vConsolidate benchmark to demonstrate that.
 
  
 
=== Implementation ===
 
=== Implementation ===
  
Intel vConsolidate v1.1. We do not run Mail VM as Intel benchmark has Microsoft Windows version only for mail workload.
+
We use standard industrial benchmark: vConsolidate. It was developed by Intel in cooperation with other vendors. vConsolidate measures performance from Java, Web and Db VMs running concurrently (we excluded Mail VM as it was MS Windows version only). Each set of such three VMs is called CSU - Consolidation Stack Unit.
 +
Performance metric is geomean from throughput of each workload type: transactions/sec for Db, requests/sec for Web and java operations/sec for Java.
  
 
=== Testbed Configuration ===
 
=== Testbed Configuration ===
Hardware:
+
Server: 4xHexCore Intel Xeon (2.66 GHz), 64 GB RAM, HP MSA1500 SAN Storage, 8 SATA (7200 RPM) Disks in RAID0
* Server: 4xHexCore Intel Xeon (2.66 GHz), 64 GB RAM, HP MSA1500 SAN Storage, 8 SATA (7200 RPM) Disks in RAID0
 
* Client: 4xHexCore Intel Xeon (2.136 GHz), 32 GB RAM
 
* Network: 1Gbit direct server <-> client connection
 
  
Platform:
+
Client: 4xHexCore Intel Xeon (2.136 GHz), 32 GB RAM
* Virtualization Software: ESXi4.1up1, XenServer5.6fp1, OpenVZ (RH5) 2.6.18-028stab090.4, OpenVZ (RH6) 2.6.32-042test006.1.x86_64
+
 
* Guest OS: Centos 5.5 x86_64
+
Network: Gbit direct server<>client connection
 +
 
 +
Virtualization Software: XenServer5.6fp1, OpenVZ (RH5) 2.6.18-028stab085.3, OpenVZ (RH6) 2.6.32-042test006.1.x86_64
 +
 
 +
Guest OS: Centos 5.5 x86_64
  
 
Software and Tunings:
 
Software and Tunings:
* Each VM/CT was configured with 4 vCPUs, 1 GB RAM
 
* Custom vConsolidate profile was used: 4 load threads for Java workload, 4 load threads for Db workload and 8 threads for Web workload (standard setting)
 
 
* Firewall was turned off
 
* Firewall was turned off
* All other settings were left as defaults
+
* All other tunings were left at default values
  
 
=== Benchmark Results ===
 
=== Benchmark Results ===
Line 33: Line 30:
 
=== Summary ===
 
=== Summary ===
  
OpenVZ demonstrates outstanding performance benefits over hypervisors in case of multi-processor environments and multi-threaded workloads:
+
*TODO: write summary
* Almost 3x times better overall performance in case of single set of workloads (1 CSU).
 
* 2.1-2.2x times better overall performance on 5 and 10 CSU.
 
 
 
=== TODO ===
 
* add a link to paper where explaining why containers are great for SMP workloads and CPU overcommit.
 

Please note that all contributions to OpenVZ Virtuozzo Containers Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then don't submit it here.
If you are going to add external links to an article, read the External links policy first!

To edit this page, please answer the question that appears below (more info):

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)