6,534
edits
Changes
one more old quote
''Andrew Morton, [http://openvz.org/pipermail/devel/2007-July/006281.html Devel mainling list]''
----
OpenVZ, which also is vying for inclusion in the mainstream Linux kernel, would complement Xen well and has impressed me in the initial testing I've conducted.
''Jason Brooks, Senior Analyst, Ziff Davis. [http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Linux-and-Open-Source/Red-Hat-Isnt-Exhibiting-XenOphobia/ eweek.com]''
----
I agree with you very much. I would say for enterprise use where cost/efficiency is not a factor, Xen has an edge over VZ. However for a service provider or other situation where CPU/RAM/DISK resources are shared among environments to ensure profitability/efficiency, openvz is far superior. Also, VZ is much simpler to use, and all of the command line utilities are well documented.
[http://forum.openvz.org/index.php?t=tree&th=572&mid=3122]
----
