Difference between revisions of "Talk:Zimbra on OpenVZ on Debian"
m (→Debian Etch has been released) |
(broke down into sections, signed the unsigned comments) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
--[[User:Dusty|Dusty]] 19:27, 9 April 2007 (EDT) | --[[User:Dusty|Dusty]] 19:27, 9 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == numflock == | ||
| + | i have put my server in production with only 10 user account and NUMFLOCK="100:110" is not enough. | ||
| + | causing mysql to fail on user creation and corrupting all of the server. | ||
| + | i needed to restore backup before corruption and put NUMFLOCK to bigger number. | ||
| + | {{unsigned|Skyde|17:54, 8 August 2007}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Set hostname and nameserver == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I had to setup a hostname because Zimbra needs one to launch the setup. | ||
| + | Also, be sure to set a nameserver in your container. {{unsigned|85.93.203.15|12:56, 23 March 2010}} | ||
Latest revision as of 11:43, 23 March 2010
Debian Etch has been released[edit]
Update this document for the new version of Debian which has gone stable. It might be as simple as changing the version number and reference to "sarge", but maybe not?
--Dusty 19:27, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
numflock[edit]
i have put my server in production with only 10 user account and NUMFLOCK="100:110" is not enough. causing mysql to fail on user creation and corrupting all of the server. i needed to restore backup before corruption and put NUMFLOCK to bigger number. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Skyde (talk • contribs) 17:54, 8 August 2007.
Set hostname and nameserver[edit]
I had to setup a hostname because Zimbra needs one to launch the setup. Also, be sure to set a nameserver in your container. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 85.93.203.15 (talk • contribs) 12:56, 23 March 2010.
